<- Yeah, yeah, it's huge, I know; but this is really important to me, so if you have the time to spare, I'd appreciate it if you could read it and comment. Danke! :) ->
From as early an age as I can remember, I’ve always been particularly fascinated by faith, and how such a global concept has spawned so many different and varying religions. Up until the age of 12, I studied my own faith, concepts, doctrines, and scriptures extensively. Raised in a Mormon household that cherished constant questioning and evaluation of faith, this was encouraged and within the structure of the Mormon church resources for study abounded. I was one of the few who generally enjoyed my two hours of Sunday School classes each weekend, even if my eager nature irritated some of my teachers when I would vehemently disagree with them on certain historical or theoretical aspects of biblical interpretation.
This came to a head when I was twelve years old and I had the opportunity to travel to Europe for the first time in my life. At that point I was living in Tucson, Arizona and, looking back, everything came together beautifully. My Sunday School class full of 11 and 12 year olds was fortunate enough to be taught by a woman who had several masters degrees in history, religion, and philosophy. I believe she even had a PhD in religious studies on top of all those other qualifications. She was a huge inspiration to me – suddenly each Sunday was set free from the usual textbook lessons, allowing us to delve deeply into the finite aspects of history, translation, doctrine, and cultural interpretation throughout the ages. I’ve never had a teacher like her since. My favorite memory of her was when we were discussing varying beliefs on the after life. Rather than take the “easy” way out and blanketly saying, “We Mormons are right and all others are wrong,” she instead took the high road, and likened world religious beliefs on death to various translations of the original texts of the Bible. It got incredibly complicated, but she made it understandable, summing the day’s studies up with quotes from famous philosophers. Although most of my fellow students despised that class, I was in heaven whenever I was able to talk to Sister Morgan. And she was the inspiration for what led to an intense period of my life across the Atlantic ocean.
At that young age I decided it was high time that I truly separate myself from all preconceived notions on doctrine and faith, study as much as I possibly could, and make a full conscious decision as to which faith I agreed with in my heart. I knew I had a testimony of Christianity and of the Mormon faith in particular – after all, I’d studied for years in order to reach the decision at the age of 8 to take the name of Christ upon myself and be baptized, something I then and still do take very seriously. But, thanks to Sister Morgan’s influence, I knew I could not be complacent in my faith, and this led perfectly into the opportunity presented by my Father’s career in the Air Force to live in Italy for a short period of time. I left Tucson for a few months in the autumn of 1998, and then again in the spring of 1999, with the intent that I would study whatever I could while in one of the heartlands of Judaism and Christianity. I studied, I traveled, I prayed; I saw Pope John Paul II at the Vatican, I went to synagogues throughout the Venetian giettos, I stared into the skull of Saint Luke in Rome, I smelt death in the gas chambers at Dachau. I approached all of this with an open mind, setting aside my history with the Mormon church, investigating as if with the intention of conversion. And at the end of my time in Italy, I returned to study my own faith anew, this time from the outside. I saw the temples in Kirtland, Mesa, Salt Lake; I read the writings of Joseph Smith, Brigham Young, and the modern prophets.
Needless to say, when I returned, I found a renewed faith in Christianity, and after some time, a renewed intensity of belief in most of what the Mormon church had to offer. I felt reassured, that I was no longer a blind follower but someone who had dedicated years of their life to confirming their faith. I was questioning everything, not just to find a name for my faith, but to acquaint myself with God on a very personal level. But despite my decision to remain a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, I was emboldened with a new respect for the faith of others. I caught a glimpse of what would later become very important to me.
I have never considered myself to be much of an outwardly religious person. I rarely find personal inspiration in outlandish ceremony, I don’t have much patience for proselytizing, I have absolutely no respect for “Bible Bashing.” Even upon my last business trip to Utah, most of my associates were shocked to find I was a Mormon, saying I showed no typical outward signs of the traditionally missionary-minded faith. Even this blog entry is a remarkable departure for me into foreign territory – I’m perfectly happy to discuss the finer points of religion with anyone, but only if invited. All the same, even if I may not show it on the outside at all times, I have more respect for faith and religion than perhaps anything else. I believe in the sanctity of the spirit, and in every individual’s inherent right to decide what is right for them, what speaks to their soul, and to react to such inspiration how they see fit. I believe faith to be a personally quiet experience, yet as a whole it speaks with greater force and eloquence than enything else on this Earth. When those voices are stifled, when individuals are told they no longer have the right to question their faith, when mocking becomes the order of the day, it personally insults me, no matter who the victim is or what their belief. When someone makes light of an individual’s right to make spiritual decisions, it’s incredibly serious and seriously wrong.
All the same, I never realized just how personally I could take it, or just how much it could sting. This was surprising to me when a few days ago my decision to be baptized was criticized and the importance of that decision mocked. This wasn’t the first time my faith had been used as a weapon by others; when my family and I moved to Mississippi when I was a child, everyone in the small town of Vicksburg seemed to know that Mormons were moving to the Army post even before we got there. We were denied housing outside the post, I was constantly surrounded by whispers at school; to make matters worse, every day for two years as I played with my neighborhood friends, two boys aged three and five would take it upon themselves to remind me that I was going to burn in Hell. As one woman told me on the street, I “might as well be a negro,” – quite a telling statement from The Deep South. My childish heart shrugged it off; rather than be hurt, I instead pitied their lack of understanding, feeling sorry for their bitter hatred that blinded so many opportunities for friendship, be it over religion or race. At school I took to playing on the playground for the African American children, associating with them rather than deal with the hatred of others, and I was happy. It didn’t sting, and I thought I would always feel that way. I thought I could rise above personal slight.
Apparently now with age and perhaps a little more experience, a little more intensity of faith, things hurt more than I ever thought they could. That pain in my heart was a surprise, one I did not know how to handle. I always tried to remember that people aren’t perfect, people sometimes can be apathetic and ignorant. But you would think that with as globalized as our society has become, more people would make an effort to understand our differences so that we will no longer fear them in ignorance. Information flows so freely at such speeds as never before seen. Why can’t we channel that efficiency of knowledge into cultural and religious understanding so that these stinging feelings in the heart of the faithful no longer have to come to pass?
I’ve been trying to take my own advice; I have been to some degree or another since those days I spent in Europe as a young teenager. I never truly concluded my studies, even when I reached the conclusion that I would remain a Mormon for the time being. I kept a list of religions I intended to study, and I have never stopped trying to work my way through them. At the moment, thanks to the inspiration of my good friend Jay, I’ve been studying Hinduism. It’s a remarkable faith, the oldest continually operating religion in history. He was kind enough to invite me to a religious holiday in August to honor Lord Ganesh, and I’m really excited about it. It’s bringing back memories of those years that I participated in Jewish holidays with my good friends the Madsens in Tucson. Those early years of study taught me something that I will never forget, something that I believe is integral to that age-old desire for world peace. Or, at least, I like to think so.
You see, I believe I am in a unique position in that, even though I was raised a Mormon, even though I’m a Christian, when it comes right down to it, I believe that all religions are true. Perhaps this is why I have never felt any hard feelings toward those of other faiths, perhaps this is why I so readily and happily participate in any religious holiday so long as I am welcome. I’m thrilled about Ganesh Pooja, just as I was when I took part in Passover, when I sang the hymns of Eucharist at Saint Peters, when I went to Catholic Mass with a former boyfriend and happily partook of their sacrament services. I have absolute faith in the foundations of each and every religion that teaches honesty and unconditional love. Be it Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism, Zoroastrianism, whatever, I believe in it. Granted, there are infinite differences in the practices and detailed semantics of each faith, but in the end, what’s the most important part of each religion? Faith in God, love of your fellow man, loyalty to your morals and standards, and a belief that there is something grander and bigger than any of us that we all must strive to understand. In my mind, anything else is merely a matter of linguistic and social translation.
How do I reconcile this with history, theology, and the age old questions of where we came from and where we’re going? Well, I like think that God is infinitely wise, merciful, and loving. And perhaps most importantly of all, He (or She or Them or what have you) knows each of us better than we know ourselves, having a perfect knowledge of not only us as individuals, but us as nations. He understands the influences of our upbringing, our societal subconscious and how that plays a part in what we are able to comprehend. In that all major religions have the same eternal truths at their core, I believe anything on top of that was divine inspiration that allowed us all – in our individual societies – to best understand and relate to those eternal truths. Centuries ago, when societies were so vastly insulated and immensely different from one another, it would have been impossible to tell a story to one culture and expect it to perfectly translate to the sensibilities of another. In much the same way, that’s still incredibly difficult today, even as globalized as we are. I believe God understood this, in part because I believe initially it was part of His design for whatever reason (i.e. that whole thing about the Tower of Babel.) I cannot believe that God would leave entire nations of His children to wander simply because their societal patterns differed from another. A wise teacher will relay information in whatever way a student learns best, be it throught sight, sound, or participation. Why wouldn’t God teach His message in ways that would be readily accessible to the audience? And since He knows his audience so well, I believe He can make anything accessible to anyone depending on our cultural upbringing.
Thus was born our myriad religious practices, holidays, and detailed doctrines. When the end destination is the same, the map we’re provided, our path, and the journey we take is inconsequential – getting there is what matters. Must we all travel the same road? Or can we respect the fact that some must approach God from a different highway than our own? Does it really matter if we call the destination Heaven, the Celestial Kingdom, or Nirvana? Does the name of who we worship matter, be it Heavenly Father, Allah, Vishnu, Ganesh, Guan Di, or Kami? In the end, we are all worshipping a higher power worthy of our respect, faith, devotion and undying love. As Shakespeare said, what’s in a name? Although names are important, I don’t think God would want us to hate each other over such semantics – it’s a name, a name for something that all religious individuals believe in: God. Our creator. A higher being who is wise and loving, who wants to see us reach our full potential. How we worship, what we call whoever it is that we worship, to me that is inconsequential. Worship how you please, call God whatever you like, follow the dictates of your heart – I believe you are just as right as I am, you’re merely following another path to the same ultimate eternal destination. If you believe you will be reincarnated so that you can further your progression along that path, then I believe you will get what your soul desires. If you believe in a heaven where your family is together for all eternity, then I believe this will be yours if you prove yourself worthy. In the end, we’re all going to get wherever it is we’re going by being faithful, good, kind, righteous people while on this Earth, by respecting and loving our God and our fellow man. Any religion that teaches these principles has my respect, love, and admiration.
I’ve decided to add yet another dream to my list of what I want to do once I am well again. I want to increase the scope of my religious studies, I want to learn more about these doctrinal semantics that currently separate us. I want to travel the world and participate in as many of our varying religious ceremonies and holidays as possible. I want to go on a pilgrimage to Mecca, I want to worship in a Shinto shrine in Japan, I want to again visit the halls of Saint Peters; I want to see Mount Sinai, Calvary Hill, the sacred rivers of India, Beijing’s Temple of Heaven. I want to see it, breathe it, live it, experience it, all so that I can continue to learn and reconcile the many differences that in my mind all seem to point to one gloriously colorful and richly diverse destination. I love the many differences between the religions of the world; I sincerely wish the hatred could be put aside, replaced by education, understanding, respect, and mutual admiration. This stinging in my heart just isn’t necessary, it doesn’t need to exist in the heart of anyone. Malice need not be ascribed to our differences. I think if we could just eliminate this “I’m right, therefore everyone else is wrong” attitude, we could all grow by leaps and bounds, individually, spiritually, and globally.
That’s how I feel anyway. At times I feel a little solitary in this belief of absolute truth, but I’m okay with that. Am I still a Christian? Yes. Do I know what to name this? No. But I can do without names; I much prefer nameless respect and love to named ignorance and pride.
I’ve always believed that no matter what the religion, it is all in service of God. You’ve done a wonderful thing in trying to educate yourself in the ways the varied people of this world choose to pay tribute to God, in whatever form the deity may take. Not everyone can claim that or even say they have attempted it. It can be a lifelong pursuit but if you are doing it with the truest intentions (which I know you are) then I know that your efforts will not be in vain.
Your journey is a remarkable one. Those who mock what they do not understand are fools as they do so.
Your conviction and search for absolute truth is wise; the key to your understanding is in the proper application thereof. Understand the true nature of reality as dictated by LDS theology. Reality is designed to never give you answers based on empircle evidence or observation. If you believe in God, then an understanding that God designed creation such that you will never obtain the answer you seek in the methods used by philosphers can save a great deal of headache.
The crafting of this world, and those like it, was to give the offspring of diety the tools that they need to become Gods….this much is evident in your philosophy. You seek universal truth. The next step in your journey is to understand that you must find this truth on the spirit plane; by prayer, meditation and spiritual experience. A testimony can be strengthened by happenstance in the physical world, but even the most mindbending theatric miracles in scripture are warped and hazed by the shroud that reality makes of them.
Seek truth, but if you truly WANT truth, seek it where you will find it. Pray for it, and don’t take no for an answer.
Just a suggestion.
This was not meant as an insult or challenge to your testimony (though I admit it seemed a bit vague reading your insightful and well written essay), merely an attempt to supplement understanding. If any offense was conveyed, I am apologetic.
I also find the religions of the world to be endlessly fascinating, though I probably haven’t studied them to the depth that you have, and I certainly haven’t been able to experience much of it. I’m not quite as accepting as you seem to be of all of it actually being true, but it is certainly enlightening and worthy of study. Furthermore, I think it’s acceptable to believe that someone is wrong in their belief without being antagonistic about it; I think that’s what we really need more of in the world.
That brings me to a difference of opinion I have with Shadow, who has moved the discussion from Semantics to Epistemology, which is the philosophy of knowledge, or how we can know what is true. This is, of course, a question that strikes at the heart of religion. Shadow’s epistemology seems to be mysticism (in the contemporary sense, not that of eastern mysticism), which is technically irrational, in that it does not invite logical analysis. Shadow furthermore completely denounces empericism, which is a rational epistemology based upon interpreting observations about the world. Science is based upon empirical epistemology.
While I don’t personally believe that empirical epistemology is the only way that truth can be ascertained, I think it is a mischaracterization of LDS doctrine to dismiss empiricism completely. I believe in an objective reality that is rational (contains only truths that do not contradict one another logically), but whose truths are not all immediately apparent to our senses. If my view is correct, then empirical epistimology is valid inasmuch as our observations correctly reflect reality. I think this viewpoint is borne out in LDS doctrine and by the existence of prominent LDS scientists.
Of course, I do not believe that empiricism is necessarily the only path to truth; in fact, our senses may obscure an underlying truth when we come up with a rational explanation for observations. This is the process of science, ever seeking to find a ‘more true’ explanation for phenomena. A truth gained by other (perhaps spiritual) means may appear to contradict with current scientific explanations for phenomena without actually contradicting the true laws of reality that actually govern those phenomena.
Anyway, I guess my point is that the question of what truth is and how you can recognize it is one that you will have to find an answer to if you want to truly make sense of the truth of religions. There is certainly no one definition of truth that is universally accepted (there’s semantics for you), so you’ll have to decide on one and whether or not you believe reality to be an objective, rational thing. If so, then there are several lifetimes of study and reasoning ahead of you in your quest to extract what is true (if by true you mean a true fact of objective reality) and what is not from the myriad contradictions of religion. Of course, if you decide that reality is subjective (which I believe is inconsistent with most theologies, especially the LDS doctrine), the question of truth becomes more or less meaningless.
I’ve rambled long enough. Thanks for posting this, and I hope you are able to do and experience all the things you wish to!
Through your moment of presumed clarity, I am seeing perceived confusion. I would continue to ask questions as you define yourself on this spiritual journey.
If a then not not a. If something is true then its negation cannot be true. If for instance you believe that Christ is the messiah, then you cannot believe that Christ is not the messiah. Sure, everyone loves a hazy group hug and the I’m Ok You’re OK of moral relativism plays well to the crowd, but in any universe with its salt there are truths and there are untruths and it is up to an individual to determine which are which. I understand the appeal of ducking religious questions in that it requires neither intense thought nor dedication and society’s grove is full of the trees that merely bend when the wind blows, but one will never find strength or answers with by joining the birches.
Jay – Thank you. 🙂
Shadow – Thank you for your post, and don’t worry, you haven’t insulted me at all. I understand where you’re coming from and respect it, although I can’t say I agree with all of it.
Levi – I love your post, thank you. And no, I think you know far more than I do. Despite that, I think we’re both thinking along the same lines regarding an approach of logic and faith. Or at least, I try to.
Brian – Until I see God face to face, there will always be some modicum of confusion.
Math Boy – I think I didn’t make my point very clear, sadly. Naturally there are contradictions between the faiths, which I do take sides on. What I was trying to say was that, at its root, I believe that all religions that teach goodness, love, and honesty are true to some extent. That root is true, because I believe they are what I tried to call “eternal truths”. What I was trying to say about societal inclinations leading to the vast differences in the minutia of religious practice, that’s where the differences come into play that lead to what you were saying about how if there is truth there must be something to the contrary. Naturally I’ve been picking and choosing between the minutia, but I don’t harbor any ill feelings toward any particular faith because I respect that in the end, those eternal truths are there and they’re all just trying to approach those as best they can in their own individual ways. Does that make sense? So yes, I believe Christ is the Messiah – naturally, that negates some parts of Judaism in my eyes, as well as several other faiths. But I still believe in the truth in their foundation, and therefore, I respect their decisions, practices, and beliefs. Does that make more sense, or am I still confusing?
It wasn’t a lack of explaining on your part, it was mostly that I just skim long posts, but still want to comment on them.
btw: Not all religions teach goodness, love, and honesty. Baal for example was not super cool, Ashteroth was a freak, Huitzilopochtli was a bloodsucking loser, Artemis ripped families apart, and Odin, Shakti, Mars, Esis, Tartanis, chinese river deities, Teteoinnan, and scads of African tribal deities have all claimed more than a few human sacrifices in their name.
`Cheshire Puss,’ she began, rather timidly, as she did not at all know whether it would like the name: however, it only grinned a little wider. `Come, it’s pleased so far,’ thought Alice, and she went on. `Would you tell me, please, which way I ought to go from here?’
`That depends a good deal on where you want to get to,’ said the Cat.
`I don’t much care where–‘ said Alice.
`Then it doesn’t matter which way you go,’ said the Cat.
`–so long as I get somewhere,’ Alice added as an explanation.
`Oh, you’re sure to do that,’ said the Cat, `if you only walk long enough.’
Hey, have you read that book yet? I know you’ve been busy lately, and I’m certainly not offended if you haven’t, but I really do think that it will do you good. I was involved in a group at school called the BAAD Club, and that’s how I was introduced to the Four Agreements. It’s one of the central philosophies behind the Peer Mentoring program I was a part of, and we received extensive training on its ideas as well as some other philosophies which together form our core philosophies which are:
1. Do It With Love
2. Leave It Better Than You Found It
3. Pay It Forward
I think the point of the Four Agreements is that the state of the world you live in is determined entirely by your perception of it, and most importantly that perception is a decision. I think that’s a big part of what you’re saying here. Perception is what causes divisions, but it’s also what causes unions. It’s what causes differences, but who and what ultimately decides what is different and what is the same? What you choose to see will determine how you choose to react. You choose to see hope, unity, love, honesty, kindness, and faith that these qualities are greater than the differences that exist, and that arguing over different perceptions of the same ideas is not only fruitless, but damaging to society and to the soul.
Rock on :-).